Esta página é um arquivo do site antigo do www.santodaime.org
This page is an archive of the old www.santodaime.org website
Clique aqui para visitar o site atual
Click here to visit the current site



nn_destaque_b.gif (219 bytes)




Canada: the Uyunkars' sentence
The following information is provided by Hugues Bonenfant who was present at the judicial process of the Uyunkars, April 24th and 25th of 2003, Manitoulin Island, province of Ontario, Canada.

See also:

Alliance among the native sacraments

Clarifying the Uyunkar's case

Dear friend,

The judicial process of the Uyunkars is over. The postponement of the hearings from March 31st 2003 to April 24th has allowed the Crown and the Defence to reach a mutual agreement on various points, so that all their speeches were summed up on April 24th and the verdict with sentence was rendered by the Judge on the morning of April 25th.

The judicial process has been substantially shortened because all the charges against Maria Ventura (the interpreter) have been dropped, as well as the charge of criminal negligence causing death laid against Juan and Edgar Uyunkar. The accusations finally held against the Uyunkars were trafficking and administering a controlled substance (i.e. the harmaline contained in the Banisteriopsis Caapi vine). The Uyunkars have agreed to plead guilty to those charges. The Natem taken in the last ceremony, used as a purgative by Juan, was brewed from the vine only. The participants were also invited to take a mixture made from tobacco and salt, the size of a grain of rice.

In the sentencing, the Judge took into consideration the 17 months the Uyunkars stayed free on bail in the province of Ontario as time served. Thus, Edgar received a one day jail sentence and the order to leave Canada within 14 days (he flew back to Ecuador April 29th). Juan was given a conditional sentence of 12 more months in Ontario, along with 150 hours of community work at Manitoulin Island and the interdiction of leading rituals involving any controlled substance. Following the completion of his sentence, Juan must return to Ecuador.

The Judge showed understanding and wisdom in this extremely sensitive and complex case. It seems that he dispensed justice to both the family of the departed elder and the two healers. It is to be hoped that this judgement will bring about a peaceful resolution in the native community of Manitoulin Island.

Furthermore, it should be emphasized that the Judge did not give credence to some arguments from the provincial Crown, such as "negligence", allegation of "cavalier behaviour", "breach of trust" or to the necessity of giving to the defendants an "exemplary and dissuasive sentence"; therefore the demand from the provincial Crown for a long term sentence in jail was not taken into consideration in his ruling. Moreover, the Judge refused to directly link the death of the elder with the ingestion of Natem/Ayahuasca. Besides, other members of the native community who also suffered from serious illnesses, amongst which diabetes, saw a clear improvement of their condition after the ceremonies with the Uyunkars. But the Judge did affirm that the death of the elder constituted an aggravating factor in the case. As far as the exact cause of the death is concerned, the Judge declared that "only the Creator could know for certain".

Out of the numerous letters of support received, 34 of them were submitted by the Defence attesting to the legitimacy of the Uyunkars and the value of the Sacred Medicine. Some were written by Ecuadorian officials, others by specialists and by members of the Manitoulin community who participated in Juan's rituals, etc. These letters, the good faith of the two healers and the legal status of Ayahuasca within a spiritual or therapeutic framework in many countries have, without a doubt, weighted favourably in the Judge's decision.

The federal Crown was not interested in debating the merits of "holistic medicines", in their proper words, but to set some limitations. It appears the Judge took into consideration the Crown's request when handing down his ruling since the chemical component harmaline is a listed III substance in the controlled substances law of Canada. However, because the Defence also said that the autopsy report mentioned that harmaline was "barely detected", and no quantity or concentration was specified or considered, therefore it could hardly be concluded that the Judge did rule on clear limitations about the "holistic medicines", as requested by the federal Crown of Canada.

While handing down the court decision, the Judge was mindful and he continuously used very respectful words when referring to Ayahuasca and the ceremonies (e.g. Sacred medicine, sacred spiritual ceremonies, highly spiritual, etc.), so it appears that the Ayahuasca came out clean in the end. Also, even if the two healers were sentenced, the fact that the Judge acknowledge this ancestral and sacred Medecine by using such respectful terms, it is to be hoped that the Canadian authorities will now have more accurate information pertaining to therapeutic and spiritual practices with Ayahuasca.

In closing, may all of those who supported spiritually and morally this cause, sent documents, letters, donations... receive sincere and heartfelt thanks. A network of solidarity between various traditions and lineages is slowly and firmly being woven...

Harmony, Love, Truth and Justice.

Hugues Bonenfant
Assistant in Juan and Edgar Uyunkar's Defence Committee
Débora Bolsanello
Assistant in Juan and Edgar Uyunkar's Defence Committee



footer.gif (1284 bytes)